I like how they say Splitboards don't belong in the backcountry, but then they support the Snowboard Bans at Alta, MRG, and Deer Valley. Just a plain old we hate snowboarding page.
"Backcountry Skiers Against Splitboards educates backcountry skiers and snowboarders regarding the dangers associated with splitboard transition deficiencies when performing companion rescues for partners caught in an avalanche."
What does this even mean?? This has to be a joke. But hey they have 7 people liking it so far
thats pretty funny.... i'd think that if theyre so concerned about the time it would take for a split partner to dig their asses out of a slide, they might focus more on hazard evaluation, terrain selection, airbag use.... or moving to a coastal snowpack i guess it is always a slowboarders fault if they get caught in an avalanche, ya gotta point fingers somewhere
I feel bad for that person...If you're that big of a waste of chode skin to create that page, and doctor up a bumper sticker. Their mother obviously beat them for being the "slow child". Either that or a splitboarder gave them a good rough shag one night, and never called them back
That person probably still bathes with GI Joe action figures to help them find where the "big brown" shark came from. (if you don't know that iconic comic reference...I'm showing my age)
_________________ "Out of the Indian approach to life there came a great freedom, an intense and absorbing respect for life, enriching faith in a supreme power, honesty, generosity, and brotherhood"
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 4:26 pm Posts: 407 Location: S.F. Bay Area
Nice fan club page... They are a little confused, and I'm a bit amused, so we are even...
If the transition time of the snowboarder that they are relying on to save their bacon in an avalanche is their biggest (and apparently only) argument against splitters, they have bigger issues to deal with.
"Backcountry Skiers Against Splitboards educates backcountry skiers and snowboarders regarding the dangers associated with splitboard transition deficiencies when performing companion rescues for partners caught in an avalanche."
What does this even mean?? .....
I assume they're referring to instances where a partner would get caught while another partner was in ski mode, who might then be a little slower to initiate a rescue.
Luckily, I have a guaranteed win-win solution for any skier who doesn't like how fast I can hustle to the rescue. Stay the fuck out of my crew.
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:15 pm Posts: 256 Location: Washington
PedroDelfuego wrote:
Thats it! I am going back to the full-on punk rock snowboarder prick I was in the 90's.
I just had to comment on that chicks blog too.
Ok, just realize, she doesn't make it very clear but she is talking about intermediate riders who are having trouble progressing to the next level. Just so folks panties don't get too wadded up. Still condescending though. Apparently written by her bad alter ego.
Just so folks panties don't get too wadded up. Still condescending though. Apparently written by her bad alter ego.
Too late! My mohawk is already cut and I am now welding steel-toes onto my snowboard boots! Gotta still find my baggy-ass DCJ pants (Denver County Jail).
_________________ Talking about snowboarding is like dancing about architecture...
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:15 pm Posts: 256 Location: Washington
PedroDelfuego wrote:
powslash wrote:
Just so folks panties don't get too wadded up. Still condescending though. Apparently written by her bad alter ego.
Too late! My mohawk is already cut and I am now welding steel-toes onto my snowboard boots! Gotta still find my baggy-ass DCJ pants (Denver County Jail).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum